News

From databases to data centres: Oracle’s earnings reshape the AI trade

Posted on: Mar 12 2026

Key takeaways

  • Oracle’s quarter suggests AI demand is broadening from chips into cloud capacity, data centres, and software platforms.

  • The huge backlog is encouraging, but the spending bill is also huge, so execution matters more than the headline.

  • For long-term investors, the AI trade now looks wider, more industrial, and less forgiving of weak balance sheets.

For much of the past two years, the AI trade has looked like a chips story with good lighting. Oracle’s latest earnings suggest it is becoming something else as well: a capacity story. The stock closed at 149.40 USD on 10 March 2026, then rose 11.8% in extended trading, after reporting a stronger quarter and lifting its outlook.

Source: Bloomberg consensus, Saxo Bank analysis.

That reaction was not just about a beat. Oracle reported third-quarter revenue of 17.2 billion USD, up 22% year on year, while cloud revenue rose 44% to 8.9 billion USD. Its cloud infrastructure business, which rents the computing power used to train and run AI models, jumped 84% to 4.9 billion USD. Remaining performance obligations, a measure of contracted future revenue, reached 553 billion USD, up 325% from a year earlier. Its multi-cloud database revenue slice, the amount Oracle earns from running its database software inside competitors’ clouds, was up a remarkable 531%. Oracle also raised fiscal 2027 revenue guidance to 90 billion USD.

Source: Bloomberg, Company Quarterly Report, Saxo Bank analysis.

The AI trade gets a second engine

Oracle matters because it sits in a useful middle ground. It is not the company designing the headline-grabbing chips, and it is not the company building the most famous AI models. It is the company selling the plumbing: databases, cloud infrastructure, and the data-centre capacity needed to turn AI ambition into actual work. That makes this quarter a useful read-through for the wider AI space.

The message is simple. AI demand is still real, and it is spreading. For a while, investors mostly rewarded the companies making the silicon. Oracle’s results suggest the market is now paying more attention to the businesses that can house, power, connect, and monetise that silicon. That has implications well beyond one stock. It supports the idea that the AI trade is broadening from chip designers into cloud operators, networking suppliers, memory providers, data-centre equipment firms, and any business sitting near the bottlenecks of compute. This is an inference from Oracle’s demand picture and the continued tightness in advanced chip manufacturing and packaging elsewhere in the supply chain.

There is another important detail here. Oracle said much of the rise in bookings came from large AI contracts where customers fund the up-front semiconductor purchases. That matters because it lowers some financing pressure on Oracle and shows how desperate customers are to secure capacity. In simple terms, clients are no longer just renting servers. In some cases, they are helping build the factory before the first light is switched on.

This is not a free lunch, even if the buffet looks excellent

The quarter was strong, but it also showed the less glamorous side of the AI boom. Oracle is spending heavily to keep up. It maintained fiscal 2026 capital expenditure guidance of 50 billion USD, and investors have focused on the strain this puts on cash flow and the balance sheet. Trailing 12-month free cash flow stood at negative 24.7 billion USD, while Oracle also tapped debt and preferred financing to support the build-out. That does not kill the story, but it changes the test. Investors now need proof that today’s capex becomes tomorrow’s durable cash generation.

That is the wider lesson for the AI space. The first phase of the trade rewarded exposure. The next phase is likely to reward execution. It is one thing to say demand is huge. It is another to deliver capacity on time, sign the right customers, protect margins, and avoid drowning in the concrete bill. Oracle said 90% of cloud capacity in the quarter was delivered on or ahead of schedule. That is encouraging. It also means the market will be far less patient if future deliveries slip.

Oracle also offered an interesting reminder that AI can be both a product and a tool. The company said advances in AI-assisted coding are helping it build more software with fewer people. That may sound like a side note, but it matters. It suggests the AI trade is not only about selling compute. It is also about lifting productivity inside the companies buying and deploying it. That opens a second lane for the theme, especially for software firms that use AI to protect margins and deepen customer relationships rather than simply talk about it on conference calls. Plenty of firms will discover that saying “AI” is not, sadly, a business model.

When the excitement meets the electricity bill

The main risks are not mysterious. First, demand could stay strong while returns disappoint if costs rise faster than revenues. Second, a few giant contracts can make growth look smoother than it really is, so investors should watch whether backlog turns into recognised revenue at the promised pace. Third, the whole AI chain still relies on supply bottlenecks in advanced chips and packaging, which means delays upstream can ripple through to cloud capacity downstream. Early warning signs include weaker contract conversion, slower capacity delivery, softer margin commentary, or any sign that customers are becoming less willing to pre-fund capacity.

Investor playbook

  • Watch whether AI winners are moving from pure chip exposure into broader infrastructure and enablement.

  • Focus on contract quality, capacity delivery, and cash conversion, not just headline growth.

  • Treat balance-sheet strength as part of the AI thesis, not a boring footnote.

  • Look for companies using AI internally to improve productivity, not only selling it externally.

The AI trade grows up

Oracle’s quarter does not mean the AI trade is easy again. It means it is evolving. The early chapters were about who made the fastest chips and who told the boldest story. This chapter is more practical. Who can build the data centres, secure the equipment, fund the expansion, and turn all that activity into repeatable revenue?

Oracle just gave one of the clearest signs yet that AI is becoming more industrial and less theoretical. For long-term investors, that is useful. The shovel still matters, of course. But now the market is paying closer attention to who owns the warehouse, the wiring, and the waiting list.

 

This material is marketing content and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results. The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options.
Ruben DalfovoInvestment StrategistSaxo Bank
Topics: Equities Highlighted articles Theme - Artificial intelligence Artificial Intelligence Quarterly earnings
investingLive Americas FX news wrap 6 Mar:Weak jobs report meets oil-driven inflation risk

Posted on: Mar 07 2026

  • US stocks close sharply lower. Indices are down for the week.
  • Fed's Hammack: Dollar dominance remains intact as Fed stays patient
  • Fed's Collins: Expects the Fed rate target to hold steady for some time
  • U.S. to launch $20B reinsurance facility for Gulf shipping
  • Iran launches attack on US forces in Bahrain, and in Baghdad.
  • ECB Schnabel: ECB is still in a good place, but war increases upside inflation risks
  • Kansas City Fed Pres. Schmid: Businesses are pausing on hiring
  • Atlanta Fed GDPNow Q1 estimate 2.1% versus 3.2% previously
  • Fed Gov. Miran: Hesitant to read too much into one month job report
  • Crude oil futures stretch toward $90 a barrel
  • US business inventories for December 0.1% versus 0.1% expected
  • Fed's Goolsbee: The jobs report was a tough miss. It was not a good month.
  • San Francisco Fed Pres. Mary Daly: No one month of data is decisional
  • US January non-farm payrolls -92K vs +59K expected
  • US January retail sales -0.2% vs -0.3% expected
  • US Non-farm Payroll takes center stage. What are the technicals telling traders?
  • investingLive European markets wrap: Oil prices surge higher on prolonged disruption fears

The focus shifted to the US jobs report released at 8:30 AM from the barrage of news from the Middle East. February U.S. employment report showed a noticeable slowdown in hiring, with nonfarm payrolls falling by about 92,000, well below expectations for modest job growth. The unemployment rate edged up to 4.4% from 4.3%, pointing to some softening in labor market conditions. Part of the weakness was linked to temporary factors, including health-care strike activity that removed roughly 31,000 workers from payrolls, along with weather-related disruptions that may have weighed on hiring during the month.

Looking beneath the headline, several sectors posted declines, including construction, manufacturing, leisure and hospitality, and private education and health services, while a few areas such as financial activities and wholesale trade saw gains. Wage growth remained relatively steady, with average hourly earnings rising 0.4% on the month and about 3.8% year over year, suggesting pay pressures have not cooled significantly.

Overall, the report points to a softer labor market for February, though some of the weakness may prove temporary due to strikes and weather effects. Still, the combination of declining payrolls and a slightly higher unemployment rate raises questions about whether hiring momentum is slowing after a period of stronger job growth earlier in the year.

The other key story of the day was the continued run higher in the price of crude oil. After falling late yesterday away from the intraday high near $82.16, the initial move was to the downside to a low of $78.24. However, sellers turned to buyers and oil prices surged. The catalyst continues to be driven largely by escalating geopolitical tensions and fears of supply disruptions. Attacks on energy infrastructure and shipping routes in the Persian Gulf threaten flows through the Strait of Hormuz, a key chokepoint for global crude shipments.

As a result, WTI crude posted a gains of over 10% for the day and 35% for the week, marking one of the largest weekly advances in decades.

U.S. retail sales for January fell by 0.2%, a smaller decline than the -0.3% drop expected, after being unchanged in the prior month. Excluding autos, sales were flat, matching expectations, while the control group—used in GDP calculations—rose 0.3%, slightly stronger than the 0.2% forecast. Retail sales excluding autos and gasoline also increased 0.3%, pointing to somewhat firmer underlying consumer spending. On a year-over-year basis, retail sales were up 3.2%, indicating that while spending softened modestly in January, overall consumer demand remains relatively resilient.There was a lot of Fedspeak today as the Fed will be heading into the blackout period at the end of day until the FOMC meeting on March 18:

Here's what the key Fed speakers said today in response to the data and the oil impact on inflation.

Mary Daly (San Francisco Fed)

  • Acknowledged the labor market weakness but urged caution against overreacting to one month of data — "don't make more of it than one month of data"
  • Flagged a dual problem: inflation above target AND oil prices rising from the Iran war — "both of our goals are risks now"
  • Noted the two-month average job gain is still below the ~30K level needed to keep unemployment steady

Austan Goolsbee (Chicago Fed)

  • Warned that oil price shocks from the Iran war "can lead in a stagflationary direction" — his most direct stagflation warning to date
  • Still expressed optimism that rates will be "a fair bit lower" by end of 2026, but cautioned against moving too fast
  • Remains a non-voter in 2026 but still influential

Stephen Miran (Fed Governor)

  • Most dovish voice today — said the weak jobs number strengthens the case for cuts
  • Argued the Fed should prioritize the labor market over inflation concerns: "I don't think we have an inflation problem"
  • Wants rates moved to near neutral, roughly a full percentage point below current levels

Beth Hammack (Cleveland Fed)

  • Stayed hawkish — reiterated rates should remain on hold "for quite some time"
  • Acknowledged two-sided risks but said her base case is holding until inflation convincingly moves lower
  • Would not cut "if the meeting were tomorrow"

Jeff Schmid (Kansas City Fed)

  • Echoed Hammack's hawkish tone, flagging concern that tariffs and other policies could reignite persistent inflation
  • Skeptical that labor market weakness alone justifies cutting while prices remain elevated

Susan Collins (Boston Fed)

  • Maintained that the bar for further easing near term remains "relatively high"
  • Warned additional monetary support risks stalling inflation's return to 2%
  • Favors holding steady "for some time"

Bottom line: The Fed is deeply divided. Miran is pushing hard for cuts, Daly and Goolsbee are worried about stagflation but open to easing later in the year, while Hammack, Schmid, and Collins are holding firm on the inflation fight. The March 18 meeting is shaping up to be a contentious one.

Looking at the markets, the USD moved lower helped by the weakness in the jobs report and perhaps the negative effect from higher oil prices especially for the lower to middle class of the K-economy. The dollar index is ending the day down -0.40% with declines vs the CHF (-0.61%) and the CAD (-0.81%) leading the charge. The GBP (-0.39%) and AUD (-0.33%) were also weaker.

The exception was the the JPY with the JPY falling vs the greenback by -0.15% as technicals helped to keep that pairs declines in check.

US stocks did not take the news well with the:

  • Dow industrial average -453.19 points or -0.95% at 47501.55
  • S&P index -90.69 points or -1.33% at 6740.02.
  • NASDAQ index -361.31 points or -1.59% at 22387.68.
  • Russell 2000 of small-cap stocks -60.27 points or - 2.33% at 2525.30.

For the trading week the largest declines were in the small cap Russell 2000 with a decline of -4%. The Dow 30 stocks shed 3% while the Nasdaq was the best performer with a decline of -1.24%. :

  • Dow industrial average fell -3.01%.
  • S&P index fell -2.02%.
  • NASDAQ index fell -1.24%
  • Russell 2000 index fell -4.06%

Yields today were mixed with the shorter end moving lower on the expectations the Fed might be forced to ease due to a slowing economy. The 2 year yield fell -3.6 basis points. The 30 year yield rose 0.9 basis point and the 10 year yield was near unchanged on the day. For the week, yields were sharply higher on the back of risk from higher inflation:

  • 2 year yield +17.3 basis points
  • 5 year yield +21.5 basis points
  • 10 year yield +18.9 basis points
  • 30 year yield +14.0 basis points.
This article was written by Greg Michalowski at investinglive.com.