News

US trade court strikes down Trump's 10% global tariffs in 2-1 ruling

Posted on: May 08 2026

A US trade court struck down Trump's 10% global tariffs 2-1, ruling the duties were not justified under a 1970s trade law; the White House had cited a $1.2 trillion goods trade deficit as grounds.

Summary:

  • The US Court of International Trade ruled 2-1 against President Trump's 10% global tariffs, finding they were not justified under the Trade Act of 1974, per the court ruling
  • The tariffs took effect on February 24 after Trump invoked Section 122 of the 1974 Act, which permits duties for up to 150 days to address balance-of-payments deficits or dollar depreciation risks, per the court filing
  • The court found the law was not an appropriate instrument for the type of trade deficits Trump cited, according to the ruling
  • The Trump administration had argued a serious balance-of-payments deficit existed, pointing to a $1.2 trillion annual goods trade deficit and a current account deficit of 4% of GDP, per the administration's legal submissions
  • The case was brought by small businesses who argued the tariffs were an attempt to circumvent a Supreme Court decision that struck down Trump's 2025 tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, per court documents
  • One dissenting judge said it was premature to grant victory to the small business plaintiffs, according to the ruling

A federal trade court has struck down President Donald Trump's 10% global tariffs, ruling in a 2-1 decision that the duties were not legally justified under the 1970s trade legislation the administration used to impose them, in a significant blow to one of the White House's central economic policy instruments.

The US Court of International Trade found in favour of a group of small businesses that challenged the tariffs after they took effect on February 24. Trump had issued the February order under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, a provision that allows a president to impose duties for a period of up to 150 days to correct serious balance-of-payments deficits or to head off an imminent depreciation of the dollar. The court determined that the law was not an appropriate tool for the kind of trade imbalances Trump cited when issuing the order.

The administration had mounted a robust defence of the tariffs, arguing that a serious balance-of-payments deficit existed in the form of a $1.2 trillion annual goods trade deficit and a current account deficit equivalent to 4% of gross domestic product. That argument did not persuade the majority of the panel, though one dissenting judge argued it was premature to hand victory to the small business plaintiffs, leaving the door open for a more protracted legal dispute.

The small businesses behind the challenge had framed the February tariff order as an attempt by the administration to sidestep an earlier Supreme Court decision that struck down Trump's 2025 tariffs, which had been imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. By reaching for a different statutory authority, the White House sought to put its tariff policy on firmer legal ground, a strategy the trade court has now rejected.

The ruling will be welcomed by import-dependent businesses and global supply chain operators who have faced rising costs since the duties came into force. The Trump administration is widely expected to appeal, meaning the legal status of the tariffs is unlikely to be resolved swiftly. Until a higher court issues a definitive ruling, companies will face continued uncertainty over whether the duties will ultimately stand, complicating investment decisions and supply chain planning across a wide range of sectors.

It's a bit of a challenge trying to keep up with all these stuff ups.

---

The ruling introduces immediate legal uncertainty over a tariff regime that has been a central pillar of the Trump administration's trade policy and a persistent source of cost pressure for businesses reliant on global supply chains. A successful challenge on the grounds of statutory overreach narrows the legislative tools available to the White House for imposing broad-based duties, and markets will reassess the durability of the entire tariff architecture if the ruling survives appeal. For energy traders, the significance lies in the downstream implications: import-dependent industries facing lower tariff costs may see input price relief, while the prospect of a less aggressive trade posture could ease some of the demand destruction fears that have weighed on oil price forecasts. The 2-1 verdict leaves room for appeal, meaning the uncertainty is unlikely to resolve quickly, and companies will be cautious about adjusting supply chain strategies until a higher court rules.

This article was written by Eamonn Sheridan at investinglive.com.
EU parliament negotiator says trade deal work is not yet done as May talks loom

Posted on: May 07 2026

EU parliament trade chief Bernd Lange says good progress has been made on EU-US trade deal legislation but more work remains, with the next trilogue set for May 19 in Strasbourg.

Summary:

  • European Parliament trade committee chair Bernd Lange said negotiators have made good progress on legislation underpinning the EU-US trade agreement but acknowledged there is still some way to go, per a European Parliament statement on Wednesday
  • A second round of talks between the Parliament and EU governments narrowed differences on key elements including a safeguard mechanism and provisions covering how the agreement will be reviewed and evaluated, according to the same statement
  • The next trilogue session is scheduled for May 19 in Strasbourg, per the European Parliament
  • Lange reaffirmed the Parliament's commitment to defending its mandate to secure additional guarantees benefiting citizens and companies in both the EU and the United States, according to the statement
  • The update follows a separate push by EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic, who met U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in Paris earlier this week to press for a swift return to the Turnberry tariff terms, meaning a 15% all-inclusive rate with agreed EU carve-outs, per the European Commission
  • The EU has described it as mutually beneficial for the deal's main features to be in place ahead of the agreement's one-year anniversary at the end of July, according to the Commission

Negotiations on the legislative framework underpinning the EU-US trade deal have advanced but remain unfinished, the European Parliament's chief trade negotiator said on Wednesday, with the next round of talks scheduled for May 19 in Strasbourg.

Bernd Lange, who chairs the Parliament's trade committee, said a second trilogue session with EU governments had brought the two sides closer on a number of contested provisions, including a safeguard mechanism and the terms under which the agreement will be subject to review and evaluation. Despite that progress, Lange was clear that more work lies ahead before the legislative underpinning of the deal can be considered settled.

The Strasbourg trilogue will take place against a backdrop of broader diplomatic pressure on the EU-US trade relationship. Earlier this week, EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic travelled to Paris to meet U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, where the EU pressed for a swift restoration of the Turnberry tariff terms agreed last year, under which a 15% all-inclusive rate with agreed carve-outs would apply to European goods entering the United States. That push came after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the previous global tariff framework in February, leading Washington to replace it with a blanket 10% surcharge that has left some EU goods facing effective rates above the Turnberry ceiling.

The European Commission has described it as mutually beneficial for the deal's core features to be secured ahead of the agreement's one-year anniversary at the end of July, a deadline that lends urgency to the remaining parliamentary and diplomatic work. Lange underlined the Parliament's commitment to advancing its mandate in a way that delivers concrete guarantees for citizens and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.

Whether the May 19 session in Strasbourg can materially close the remaining gaps will determine how much pressure falls on subsequent rounds before the July window closes.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer,

---

The confirmation of a May 19 trilogue in Strasbourg signals that the legislative architecture underpinning the EU-US trade deal remains unfinished, keeping tariff and market access uncertainty in play for European exporters for at least another fortnight. Progress on the safeguard mechanism and review provisions is meaningful for business planning, but the distance still to travel on the broader framework means the deal's main features are unlikely to be locked in well ahead of the July one-year anniversary that Brussels has flagged as a target. For energy traders, the continued uncertainty around Turnberry tariff restoration, and any knock-on effects on EU-US commodity flows, remains a background risk in an already elevated geopolitical environment.

---

A trilogue is a three-way negotiation between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union (which represents member state governments), and the European Commission. It's the standard process by which EU legislation gets finalised, with all three institutions needing to reach agreement before a law or framework can be adopted. The talks are usually informal and closed-door, which often speeds things up compared to the formal legislative procedure. In this context, it refers to the three parties working through the specific rules and mechanisms that will give the EU-US trade deal its legal backbone.

This article was written by Eamonn Sheridan at investinglive.com.
Top 3 trade ideas for 28 April 2026

Posted on: Apr 29 2026

Trade ideas for EURJPY, GBPUSD, and AUDUSD are available today. The ideas expire on 29 April 2026 at 8:00 AM (GMT +3).

EURJPY trade idea

The EURJPY currency pair is showing no clear signs of an end to its upward movement, despite a local bearish correction, indicating continued bullish momentum in the medium term. The overall positive market sentiment remains, although the likelihood of a continued corrective decline is still high. The risk-to-reward ratio for opening long positions at current levels remains unfavourable, making buying less attractive. A firm move above the 186.50 level would confirm strengthening bullish momentum and open the door to further growth towards 188.00. Today’s trade idea for EURJPY suggests placing a pending Buy Limit order.

For EURJPY, there is a slight predominance of bearish expectations – 52% versus 48%. The risk-to-reward ratio is 1:4. The potential profit is 150 pips at the first take-profit target and 200 pips at the second, while possible losses are limited to 50 pips.

Trading plan

  • Entry point: 186.00
  • Target: 187.50
  • Target 2: 188.00
  • Stop-loss: 185.50

Explore More Trade Ideas

GBPUSD trade idea

The 1.3576 resistance level held back further GBPUSD growth, after which increased selling pressure triggered a reversal and a downward movement. The current decline is expected to continue in the short term, although the overall bias remains upward, and any corrective pullbacks will likely be limited. Under these conditions, the preferred strategy remains searching for buying opportunities on dips with a tight stop-loss, considering the potential for the uptrend to resume. The key support level is located at 1.3470, where a buying reaction is possible. Today’s trade idea for GBPUSD suggests placing a pending Buy Limit order.

Market sentiment for GBPUSD shows a bearish bias – 55% versus 45%. The risk-to-reward ratio exceeds 1:4. The potential profit is 126 pips at the first take-profit target and 200 pips at the second, with possible losses capped at 44 pips.

Trading plan

  • Entry point: 1.3470
  • Target 1: 1.3596
  • Target 2: 1.3670
  • Stop-loss: 1.3426

Explore More Trade Ideas

AUDUSD trade idea

Buyers continue to maintain control of the AUDUSD pair, although weakening upward momentum suggests a reversal pattern is likely. In the short term, the pair could attempt to continue its upward trajectory, but the current price action is beginning to show signs of forming a local peak. Under these conditions, the preferred scenario becomes searching for selling opportunities on price rises. The key resistance level is concentrated at 0.7200, where increased selling pressure is expected. Today’s trade idea for AUDUSD suggests placing a pending Sell Limit order.

The news background for AUDUSD reflects a predominance of bearish expectations – 54% versus 46%. The risk-to-reward ratio is 1:5. The potential profit is 100 pips at the first take-profit target and 125 pips at the second, with possible losses limited to 25 pips.

Trading plan

  • Entry point: 0.7200
  • Target: 0.7100
  • Target 2: 0.7075
  • Stop-loss: 0.7225

Explore More Trade Ideas

Editors’ picks

EURUSD 2026-2027 forecast: key market trends and future predictions

This article provides the EURUSD forecast for 2026 and 2027 and highlights the main factors determining the direction of the pair’s movements. We will apply technical analysis, take into account the opinions of leading experts, large banks, and financial institutions, and study AI-based forecasts. This comprehensive insight into EURUSD predictions should help investors and traders make informed decisions.

Gold (XAUUSD) forecast 2026 and beyond: expert insights, price predictions, and analysis

Dive deep into the Gold (XAUUSD) price outlook for 2026 and beyond, combining technical analysis, expert forecasts, and key macroeconomic factors. It explains the drivers behind gold’s recent surge, explores potential scenarios including a move toward 4,500 to 5,000 USD per ounce, and highlights why the metal remains a strong hedge during global uncertainty.